More new copyright law

At the beginning of October the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1988) was amended again. More copyright-exceptions have been altered or added, some of which have a bearing on the work of Loughborough University.
s 30 (Criticism, review, quotation and news reporting)
This exception now allows you to reuse a work ‘fairly’ without permission from its copyright-owner for the purpose of quotation (as well as for criticism, review and news reporting). Note that:

  • ‘fair’ is not defined and is a matter for individual judgement (and in the last resort for the judgement of the courts);
  • you may only quote published works in this way, not unpublished ones;
  • a quote may be “no more than is required by the specific purpose for which it is used”;
  • you must acknowledge (i.e. cite) what you quote;
  • if you are using a work under licence (such as an online journal article paid for by the University Library), you have the right to quote it in this way whatever the licence says.

This exception applies to the quoting of other people’s work in work of your own (whether published or unpublished, examined or unexamined). The purpose of a quotation is left unspecified: it need not necessarily be for criticism or review; it could be for a much looser illustrative or indicative purpose, provided that it is ‘fair’ in the circumstances.
s 30A (Caricature, parody or pastiche)
This is a new exception and (at the moment) is very open-ended. It allows you to reuse a work ‘fairly’ without permission from its copyright owner “for the purposes of caricature, parody or pastiche”. Note that:

  • ‘fair’ is not defined and is a matter for individual judgement (and in the last resort for the judgement of the courts);
  • if you are using a work under licence (such as an online journal article paid for by the University Library), you have the right to parody it in this way whatever the licence says.

This exception is probably of most interest to members of the School of the Arts and of the Department of English and Drama.
s 28B (Personal copies for private use)
This new exception is intended to allow private individuals to make copies of copies of works that they own (e.g. making an MP3 copy of a tape-cassette copy of a piece of music). It has no direct bearing on the work of Loughborough University. For more information, see JISC Legal.

 1,328 total views

New copyright law : what difference does it make to us?

At the beginning of June the Copyright Designs and Patents Act (CDPA) 1988 was amended. Several copyright-exceptions have been changed which have to do with learning, teaching and research at Loughborough University, and also with the functions of the University Library and Archive. The law has been improved in several ways.

  • SIMPLIFICATION. Some exceptions have been shortened, simplified or re-organized.
  • UNIFORMITY. Some exceptions now apply to all (or almost all) kinds of work.
  • CONTRACT-OVERRIDE. Some exceptions now apply in spite of what any contract says about our reuse of a particular work—contracts include the CLA Licence, other licences and database and e-journal subscription agreements.
  • SECURE NETWORKS. Some exceptions now allow works or copies of works to be made available on the internet by means of secure networks—this includes Learn, E-Reserve and the Reading Lists system.

The amendments to the law affect the following activities:

  1. research and data mining;
  2. accessible copies for the disabled;
  3. reusing works in lectures, classes etc.; and in theses and dissertations.
  4. recording broadcasts;
  5. photocopying and scanning for students;
  6. ‘library privilege’.

There are also future amendments planned for the autumn.

s 29 (Research and private study and text and data analysis for non commercial research)

  • For non-commercial research and private study, ‘dealing fairly’ without permission from the copyright-owner used to be allowed only with literary, artistic, musical and dramatic works—it is now allowed with all kinds of work.
  • Making a copy of a work for data mining for non-commercial research purposes is now allowed, provided that the copy is ‘fair’.
  • You can do all these things with any work that you have access to, regardless of what any contract, e.g. a licence, says.
  • N.B.: this is still a ‘fair dealing’ exception, so you must use your judgement about what is likely to be regarded as ‘fair’.
  • N.B.: this applies to the process of carrying out research, but it does not apply to what you publish when you have completed your investigation.

ss 31A-31F (Disability)

  • An accessible copy of a work may now be made not just for a person with a visual impairment, but for any person “whose disability prevents the person from enjoying the work to the same degree as a person who does not have that disability” (s 31A(1)(b)).
  • An accessible copy may now be made of any kind of work (including broadcasts, films and sound recordings).
  • No contract (such as a licence or subscription agreement) can override this exception.
  • However, the making of accessible copies is only allowed “if the same kind of accessible copies of the work are not commercially available on reasonable terms by or with the authority of the copyright owner” (s 31A(2)(c)) – this means that the University must buy a suitable accessible copy if one is available.
  • Copying under this exception still entails a considerable burden of record-keeping.

s 32 (Illustration for instruction)

This replaces the earlier version of section 32 (Things done for the purposes of instruction or examination) and is much shorter and simpler.  The new section 32 allows you to ‘deal fairly’ with a work without permission from the copyright-owner provided that:

  • you do so “for the sole purpose of illustration for instruction”;
  • the instruction is for a non-commercial purpose;
  • that you are either the one giving (or preparing to give) or the one receiving (or preparing to receive) instruction;
  • that you give an acknowledgement (where practicable).

“Illustration for instruction” includes the setting, communicating and answering of examination questions.  It is assumed that examinations still include dissertations and theses, insofar as they are examined. E-theses are still not covered by this section, but they are covered by s 30 (Criticism, review and news reporting), which is also a ‘fair dealing’ exception.

  • You can now legally show scans or photocopies in a lecture, class etc. without reference to any licence.
  • You can do all these things with any work that you have access to, regardless of what any contract, e.g. a licence, says.
  • N.B.: this is now a ‘fair dealing’ exception (which it was not before), so you must use your judgement about what is likely to be regarded as ‘fair’.
  • N.B.: this Section does not cover the distribution of copies of a work to students for use outside the lecture, class etc. (e.g. by means of handouts or Learn). For this we use either the CLA Licence for photocopying or scanning or section 36 (see below).

s 35 (Recording by educational establishments of broadcasts)

This section allows you to record and to play broadcasts to students for non-commercial educational purposes.  You may now record a broadcast and make it available to students off campus by means of a “secure electronic network accessible only by [Loughborough University] pupils and staff”.  This was not allowed before.

This section is worded in such a way as to make it necessary for us to rely on ERA Plus and Box of Broadcasts for recording most British broadcasts; but for any broadcast not covered ERA or BOB, you may record it and play it in accordance with the provisions of this section without infringing copyright.

s 36 (Copying and use of extracts of works by educational establishments)

This section traditionally allows members of staff to copy extracts of works into hand-outs and course-packs for students. It has been updated in several ways:

  • any copy made as per section 36 may now be placed on a “secure electronic network accessible only by [Loughborough University] pupils and staff”—in other words you may scan or digitize extracts and put them on Learn;
  • up to 5% of a given work may be copied by Loughborough University within a 12 month period—this is somewhat more restrictive than the CLA Licence, which allows up to 5% of a work to be copied per ‘course of study’;
  • “a work which incorporates another work is to be treated as a single work”—this means that if you want to copy, say, a few pages of a book, and there is a diagram on one of the pages, you can copy the whole of the diagram, despite the fact that it is a distinct artistic work in its own right.

N.B.: this section is worded in such a way as to make it necessary for us still to rely on the CLA Licence for most photocopying and scanning; but if there is a document that you wish to copy and to distribute which is not covered by the CLA Licence, then you may go ahead in accordance with the provisions of this section without infringing copyright. You can check whether a document is covered by the CLA Licence here.

ss 37-44A (Libraries and archives)

These sections allow libraries to supply copies of (parts of) works to other libraries; they allow libraries to supply copies of (parts of) works to readers for purposes of research or private study; they allow libraries to make replacement copies of works for the purpose of preserving their original copies. Many of these sections have been re-organized and reworded and ss 37-40 have been repealed altogether.

s 40B is an entirely new section: it allows the University Library or Loughborough University as a whole to make works available to the public, for purposes of non-commercial research or private study, on computer terminals on its premises. It says nothing about digitizing (i.e. copying) works for this purpose: but it seems at least possible that a digital copy of a work could be made under s 42 (“in order to preserve or replace that item in the collection”) and then made available under s 40B. A licence or other contract (such as a database subscription agreement) can overrule s 40B.

s 42A is newly-inserted, and essentially combines many of the provisions of the former ss 37–40 in one section—this is the one that allows copying for (inter-library) document supply to readers.

A person requesting a copy to be made under the provisions of ss 42A and 43 must provide a “declaration in writing” that he/she has not previously received a copy of the same material, etc. etc. A signature used to be required for this declaration by s 37(2)(a), but this is now repealed.  This means that requests for inter-library document supply may now be submitted by e-mail without any signature.

Any charge made for copying under the provisions of ss 41, 42, 42A and 43 must be “calculated by reference to the costs attributable to the production of the copy”; but charging is no longer compulsory.


It is expected that s 30 (Criticism, review and news reporting) will be extended to allow ‘fair dealing’ with a work for the purposes of quotation, caricature, parody and pastiche.  An exception for quotation would certainly give more leeway to researchers in what and how they could quote other people’s works in their own publications.  This may happen in autumn 2014.

 1,474 total views

Attention all teaching staff : scanning report deadline

If you have used scanned versions of printed documents for teaching this year (i.e. between 1 June 2013 and 31 May 2014) then you must report them by 31 May to the Designated Person in your Department or School. This includes:

  • any printed document that has been scanned and is on Learn;
  • any printed document that has been scanned and has been included on lecture slides that are on Learn;
  • any printed document that has been scanned and distributed to students in some other way.

Note that you must report any scanned document that you have used for this year’s teaching – even if you scanned it before 1 June 2013.

You do not need to report:

  • photocopying;
  • the use of e-resources (e.g. online journal articles).

There is more information about the reporting process here.

If you would like any help or advice about this, please contact the University Copyright Advisor:;

01509 222351.

 1,012 total views

What’s in a name? Easter egg copyright fiasco


Mupfel80, 2013. Issued under a CC0 Declaration (

Fearing a celebrity lawsuit for infringement of copyright, confectioner Thorntons has refused to sell a personalized chocolate Easter egg inscribed with a boy’s name ‘Rooney’.

Jo-Anne Scholes (mother of Rooney Scholes, supporter of Manchester United F.C. and owner of cats ‘Cantona’ and ‘Berbatov’) described the refusal as “barmy”, “madness”, “beyond belief” and “a total farce”.

The law of copyright in Britain does not protect people’s names – it protects works.  If you are planning to have something written on an Easter egg, but are unsure whether you are likely to infringe copyright, there is more information available here:

For full details of the Rooney Easter egg, see:

 1,295 total views,  1 views today

Changes to the law take shape

Draft versions of Statutory Instruments intended to amend the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (CPDA) 1988 are now available via the Intellectual Property Office website (  These changes are expected to become law in the summer.  Several of the them will affect students and staff at Loughborough University, and how they go about using materials protected by copyright.

Research, private study, data-mining.  Section 29 of the CDPA (, which at the moment is a ‘Fair Dealing’ provision for non-commercial ‘Research and private study’, will be extended to cover all works, and not just literary, dramatic, musical and artistic ones; it will also include a new sub-section allowing copying for the purpose of non-commercial data-mining and text-mining (  This will increase the scope of what material can be copied by people engaged in individual research or study at Loughborough University, whether staff or students; but of course it does not cover copying done by or for people engaged in collective study, i.e. students all enrolled on the same module.  Copying for this purpose must still be done under the CLA Licence.

Criticism, review, quotation.  Section 30 (, which at the moment is a ‘Fair Dealing’ provision for ‘Criticism, review and news reporting’ will become a provision for ‘Criticism, review, quotation and news reporting’; there will be a new sub-section dealing specifically with ‘quotation’; there will also be a new sub-section allowing ‘Fair Dealing’ for the purposes of ‘Caricature, parody or pastiche’ (  These changes will presumably allow greater latitude to researchers Loughborough University in what they may legitimately copy by way of quotation in their publications.

Accessible copies for persons with disabilities.  Sections 31A-31F (, which at present concern the making of accessible copies for people with visual impairments, will be amended to allow the making of accessible copies for people with any relevant disability – e.g. dyslexia (  This will certainly be valuable to members of the University with disabilities that make it difficult for them to use copies of particular works in their present forms.

Education and instruction.  Section 32 (, which allows certain kinds of copying and other reuse of certain kinds materials for educational instruction and examinations, will be replaced by a much simpler ‘Fair Dealing’ provision for ‘Illustration for instruction’ (  ‘Illustration for instruction’ will be taken to include things reused in examinations – and of course this will include material reused in dissertations and theses.

Recordings of broadcasts and multiple photocopies.  Sections 35 and 36 ( ;, which allow the recording of broadcasts and the making of multiple copies of extracts of works by educational institutions for use in classes, lectures etc., will be amended so as to allow these recordings and copies of  to be made available to distance learners by means of secure authentication – e.g. using Learn or Box of Broadcasts (  These amendments also effectively require the University to continue to subscribe to Licences from ERA and CLA.

A Government guide to these changes is available here:

 1,297 total views

More re-usable pictures : British Library and Wellcome Trust


TENDENCY OF STUDENT LIFE, taken from: N.S. Shaler, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, London : Sampson, Low and Marston, 1894, p. 582. Image courtesy of the British Library. CLICK TO ENLARGE.

The British Library and the Wellcome Trust have recently digitized and made available thousands of Public Domain (copyright-expired) images to be downloaded and re-used by the public.

The British Library photostream on Flickr contains images mainly taken from books in the BL’s collections, covering a wide variety of subjects.  The records for the images include links to the catalogue-records of the books that they are from, and in some cases even to .pdf files of entire books.  Despite owning the copyright in the digitized versions of these images, the BL has made many of them available without formal licences.  However, the BL does request that the users of its Flickr images follow certain principles.

The Wellcome Images collection has mainly to do with the history and anthropology of medicine and the biological sciences (it includes a section on sports and exercise).  The images are available in different formats: most images have formats (often .jpg) that are freely available for re-use under a Creative Commons licence.

More guidance about finding re-usable images online is available here.

 1,268 total views

Search Google Images for re-usable pictures

Google Images has introduced a new feature that allows you to find images that you can re-use without infringing other people’s copyright.

Go to Google Images (, and search for what you are interested in.  We’ll do a search for ‘Ben Nevis’ (Figure 1 – click on the Figure to see the details).

Google Images search for 'Ben Nevis'.

Figure 1. © Google, 2014.

When the results appear, click on the ‘Search tools’ button, and you will get a set of drop down menus.  You can use the ‘Usage Rights’ menu to filter the results according to what permissions have been granted for their re-use.  We’ll select images that have simply been ‘labeled for reuse’ (Figure 2 – click on the Figure to see the details).

Google Images 'Usage Rights' filter

Figure 2. © Google, 2014.

The results on the screen will change: the ones that you may not re-use should have been filtered out.  You can now select one that you like the look of (Figure 3) and go to the website where it has been uploaded.

One filtered result from Google Images

Figure 3. © Google, 2014, and John Dyason, 2006. Reproduced here under a Creative Commons licence (

Always check on the original website that you really are allowed to re-use the picture that you want.  This example says clearly that it has been issued for re-use under a Creative Commons licence, and provides a link to that licence (Figure 4 – click on the Figure to see the details).

Licence information details

Figure 4. © Geograph, 2014, and John Dyason, 2006. Reproduced here under a Creative Commons licence (

You can find more information about Creative Commons licences here:

 2,355 total views

Shiver me timbers : The Pirate Bay website weighs anchor (again)

Pirate Ship and the Setting Sun

© Paul Hamilton, used here under a Creative Commons licence (

Infamous file-sharing website The Pirate Bay has fled from the Caribbean to the Atlantic in an attempt to evade the authorities.  Having been chased from one internet domain to another, the file-sharing site had been operating from, based in the Caribbean island of St. Martin, a colony of the Netherlands.  Pressure from a Dutch lobby group against copyright infringement has forced The Pirate Bay to move to a new domain,, based in the island of Ascension.  But the British authorities there are unlikely to allow Ascension to become a nest of pirates, and it has been suggested that the website’s next destination may be Peru.

You can read more about this story in The Independent.

Guidance is available for using video files or audio files without infringing copyright.

 1,196 total views